Descripción:Over an hour before the WTC 7 demolition at 4:10pm, Aaron Brown reports - "building 7, in the wtc complex, is on fire and has either collapsed, or is collapsing".

Descripción:A look at fire in two steel framed buildings with different results.

Descripción:wtc 7 collapse

Descripción:This video is a followup to http://youtube.com/watch?v=gC44L0-2zL8 See also Part II: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtKLtUiww80 ---------------------------- In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at freefall, but the coverup was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged freefall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. -------- Go to www.AE911truth.org and sign the petition for a REAL investigation.

Descripción:BBC's public response on Wed 2/28: LINK: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html www.STOPROSIEENDAMERICA.com 1. We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening. 2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate - but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did - sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving. 3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did - like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services. 4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another. 5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today "so the guy in the studio didn't quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy... " HA! THEY say they lost the tapes from the single most important news day of our generation! They lost the 9/11 tapes HAHAH! That's hilarously absurd. ------ Someone on the inside was either trying to blow the whistle, or they had really shakey boots while engaging in this day's "false flag" event. I must say, the more we uncover, the more we see how incredibly sloppy they really were in trying to fool the world into thinking we have a "new enemy". I guess you can't blame the neo cons for trying, I mean after Russia fell, what choice did they have? "Oh! I know! How about we create a fake enemy?!" "Give that man a metal! How would you like to have a seat on the NYSE?!? Or how about a #3 position at CIA!?" At this point you just have you laugh your ass off at the absurdity of it all. At least we have those Democrats to save us! HAHAH! LOL!

Descripción:In April 2007, Italian TV broadcasted a definite proof that Building 7 was demolished by explosives. For the rest of the series, go to luogocomune.net

Descripción:On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed. This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST. 9/11 was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7. What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder. Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails. So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.

Descripción:Do you work in a large office building? Then you should know about this recently discovered flaw in ALL EXISTING BUILDING CODES AND FIRE REGULATIONS that could cause the complete collapse of your office building. For more information on this phenonmenon, please email NIST at wtc@nist.gov Please do not visit the following sites for more information about what really happened, as they don't agree with NIST's expert and trustworthy analysis: http://www.ae911truth.org http://www.stj911.com http://www.911blogger.com http://www.corbettreport.com You have been warned.

Descripción:From CNN Remembers. CNN have packaged all the oddities surrounding the collapse of WTC7 in a nice little edit!

Descripción:This video is a followup to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtKLtUiww80 ---------------------------- In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at freefall, but the coverup was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged freefall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. Part I chronicles NIST's attempted obfuscation and eventual admission of freefall. Part II demonstrates that their replacement theory is based on fabricated evidence and is a continuation of the coverup. Part III spells out the significance of NIST's admission of freefall. -------- Go to www.AE911truth.org and sign the petition for a REAL investigation.

Descripción:Some viewers have questioned the details of the measurements shown in this video. I have created a FAQ page to deal with these questions. See http://www.911speakout.org/WTC7-Measurement-FAQ.pdf ---------------------------- This video is a followup to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng ---------------------------- In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at freefall, but the coverup was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged freefall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. Part I chronicles NIST's attempted obfuscation and eventual admission of freefall. Part II demonstrates that their replacement theory is based on fabricated evidence and is a continuation of the coverup. Part III will spell out the significance of NIST's admission of freefall. -------- Go to www.AE911truth.org and sign the petition for a REAL investigation.

Descripción:BREAKING NEWS--NEW NIST ANALYSIS ACKNOWLEDGES FREEFALL FOR WTC7. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng -------------------------------- NIST has reversed its earlier denial of freefall and acknowledged a period of freefall comparable to this analysis in their final report on WTC7 released in November 2008. They did their own measurement with a point near the center of the roof line and came up with an acceleration of 9.81 for approximately 2.25 sec. Their report did not, however, face the consequences of this acknowledgment: that ALL RESISTANCE was instantaneously removed across the width of the building, supporting pre-planted explosives as the cause of the collapse. ----------------------------------- (Original comment comments follow) ----------------------------------- Contrary to the August 2008 NIST report on WTC7, the acceleration of Building 7 is measured and is found to be indistinguishable from the acceleration of gravity over a period of about 2.5 seconds of fall. During the first round of questions in the Aug 26, 2008 NIST Technical Briefing (at 1:01:45 into the presentation) the following question was asked by David Chandler: "Any number of competent measurements using a variety of methods indicate the northwest corner of WTC 7 fell with an acceleration within a few percent of the acceleration of gravity. Yet your report contradicts this, claiming 40% slower than freefall based on a single data point. How can such a public, visible, easily measurable quantity be set aside?" Dr. Shyam Sunder replies: "Could you repeat the question?" [the question is repeated by the moderator, leaving out the word, "competent" as well as the last sentence] "Well...um...the...first of all gravity...um...gravity is the loading function that applies to the structure...um...at...um...applies....to every body...every...uh...on...all bodies on...ah...on...um... this particular...on this planet not just...um...uh...in ground zero...um...the...uh...the analysis shows a difference in time between a free fall time, a free fall time would be an object that has no...uh... structural components below it. And if you look at the analysis of the video it shows that the time it takes for the...17...uh...for the roof line of the video to collapse down the 17 floors that you can actually see in the video below which you can't see anything in the video is about...uh... 3.9 seconds. What the analysis shows...and...uh...the structural analysis shows, the collapse analysis shows that same time that it took for the structural model to come down from the roof line all the way for those 17 floors to disappear is...um... 5.4 seconds. It's...uh..., about one point...uh...five seconds or roughly 40% more time for that free fall to happen. And that is not at all unusual because there was structural resistance that was provided in this particular case. And you had...you had a sequence of structural failures that had to take place and everything was not instantaneous." -------- Note that: --He acknowledges that freefall can only occur if there is no structure under the falling section of the building. --He acknowledges that their structural modeling predicts a fall slower than freefall. --He acknowledges that there was structural resistance in this particular case. --He acknowledges that there was a sequence of failures that had to take place and that this process was not instantaneous. Thus, he acknowledges that their model is at variance with the observable fact that freefall actually occurred. Their response is to hold to their model, deny that freefall occurred, and put up a smokescreen of irrelevant measurements that obscure the reality. -------- Go to www.AE911truth.org and sign the petition for a REAL investigation.

Descripción:http://www.loosechange911.com http://www.prisonplanet.com/ http://www.infowars.com/ Exclusive: Emergency Coordinator Barry Jennings gives his explosive account from inside WTC7 hours before its collapse on 9/11.

Descripción:WTC 7 Falls in under 7 seconds. The rate of free fall for the 47 story building is 6.8 seconds.

Descripción:An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows a BBC reporter talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head. More info at http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/260207building7.htm

Descripción:This is a longer version of the Jowenko WTC7 interview, the short movie (posted at youtube) was from TV, they provides this online and I've added these subtitles in my best English. This interview itself looks like it consists of 2 parts (cut in 3 now) but it doesn't contain some quotes of the short interview, there must be more, but this is all that is available and will be available. Jowenko has been contacted a lot after the tv program and must be sick of it now. next part: http://youtube.com/watch?v=sep-HDZoEBM

Descripción:A comparison between what we are told and what we can see, with our own eyes. World Trade Center 7 collapsed after having been damaged by fire and falling debris, but the collapse looks very much like a controlled demolition.

Descripción:UPDATE: New details have emerged about these videos. Please see the following article for more information: http://www.corbettreport.com/articles/20081106_details_collapse_footage.htm This footage was posted to video sharing network Veoh.com on November 1, 2008: http://www.veoh.com/videos/v16415017FADebtjf To download higher quality WMV files of these videos, please use the following links: WTC7 http://www.sendspace.com/file/oyajlc North Tower http://www.megaupload.com/?d=YGWWCV3E For detailed analysis of these videos, please stay tuned to: http://www.corbettreport.com

Descripción:Those who question the official epxlanation of the 9/11 2001 attacks cling to this one issue. The owner of the World Trade Centers (the three that collapsed) said in an interview that he and the FDNY decided to PULL the building. The debate rages about the term and whether it has anything to do with the controlled demolition industry.

Descripción:Interior of WTC7